Res Judicata Does Not Bar Claims Raised in Private Suit That Did Not Seek FCA Recovery; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania No. 20-2027, U.S. and Pennsylvania ex rel. Alisha Alejandro v. Philadelphia Vision Center, et al.

The district court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss a qui tam case under the doctrine of res judicata. The defendants argued that the relator had previously raised the exact same claims in a personal damages suit that had been resolved in their favor, and therefore she could not raise the same claims under the […]
Must be a Paid Member or a Free Trial Member to Access Content. Members log in here.