It was one of the first legal challenges to a Trump administration policy to reach the Supreme Court in February, and since then it has returned to the nation’s highest court twice. Over nearly nine months, the lawsuit challenging President Trump’s attempt to slash foreign aid funding has ricocheted around the federal judiciary but still has not reached a final resolution. It has been reviewed by 21 judges, spawned thousands of pages of filings and lumbered forward even after the administration dissolved the U.S. Agency for International Development, the government office responsible for disbursing much of the contested funding.
International Development
Trending Now
A New Landscape for Development • The Revolutionary Overhaul of FAR Part 15: A Review • The restructuring of procurement operations across government • Why Nonprofit Mergers Should Be Seen As Impact Strategy, Not Failure • Courts Asked to Review Constitutionality of the 8(a) Program and Race-Based Presumptions
The Monthslong Legal Battle to Save Foreign Aid
Stay ahead in international development contracting with daily updates on USAID, global procurement, and foreign assistance with our Development newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.