Holland & Knight – Federal contractors face few threats more serious than suspension or debarment. This exclusionary action has become more prevalent during the Trump Administration. For example, at the end of 2025, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) suspended nearly 7,000 Minnesota borrowers for “suspected fraudulent activity.” A few weeks later, the U.S. Department of War announced a review of small business set-aside contractors of more than $20 million. Understanding the procurement suspension and debarment regime is crucial for contractors to protect their eligibility for federal contracts and avoid exclusion that can have immediate and long-lasting business consequences.
International Development
Trending Now
Workforce Reclassified: Understanding DOL’s “New” Independent Contractor Classification Rule • 1st Annual CGD Women in Leadership Conference: From Pipeline to Power: Evidence on Women’s Leadership in Global Institutions • FAR 2.0 Update: Deviations and FAR Companion Guide • SBA Moves to Terminate Over 620 Firms in 8(a) Federal Contracting Program That Refused to Turn Over Financial Data • Buying or Selling: Navigating the New Landscape of 8(a) M&A Transactions
Understanding Procurement-Based Suspension and Debarment in Federal Contracting
chase4concept | Shutterstock
Stay ahead in international development contracting with daily updates on USAID, global procurement, and foreign assistance with our Development newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.
