The Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in one of the largest False Claims Act recoveries in recent years, reinstating the majority of a massive $350 million jury verdict. The decision weighs in on a number of key and emerging FCA issues, including materiality under Escobar and relator standing. The decision is beneficial to relators and the government, but the Eleventh Circuit’s reasoning, especially with regard to Escobar, is less than clear and leaves much open to interpretation. It states that the key difference between two claims is whether the purported fraudulent scheme had a direct and “obvious” impact on the government’s payments.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
New Bill Would Tighten Fraud Screening Across Federal Awards • US Department of Labor Announces 2026 Virtual Seminars for Current, Prospective Federal Contractors on Prevailing Wage Requirements • Grants Compliance 101: Your Grant Project Is Moving Forward. Now What? • FTC Signals Renewed “Made in USA” Enforcement Focus Following Trump Executive Order • The New DEI Crackdown: What Federal Contractors Must Do Now
How Do You Know When a Term Is Material? It’s “Obvious,” Says the Eleventh Circuit
Stefan Malloch | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.