In a recent decision in HotChalk, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., the Ninth Circuit found that the defendants’ liability insurance coverage was precluded for an FCA suit because the insured’s professional service had a direct relationship to the alleged misconduct. After former employees filed a qui tam suit alleging the firm paid recruiters improper bonuses and commissions, which resulted in false claims in financial aid to the Department of Education, HotChalk tendered the claims to its insurer under its D&O policy. The insurer denied the claim under the policy’s professional services exclusion. HotChalk sued, but the district court and Ninth Circuit both upheld the denial, holding that the professional liability exclusion precluded coverage for any claim arising from the rendering, or failure to render, professional services. Because the services provided by HotChalk directly contributed to the alleged misconduct, the courts held the exclusion applied.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
Customs Enforcement Heats Up: What Importers Need to Know • SBA Finalizes Rule Regarding Social Disadvantage Requirements for Individually-Owned 8(a) Applicants • The Most Important Phrase in GSA’s Revised AI Clause Has No Definition • What Does the AI Revolution Mean for Compliance Employees? • FBI Investigating North Korean Remote IT Staffer Working for US Agency
Professional Services Exclusion Precludes Coverage for False Claims Act Suit
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.