Home Compliance Supreme Court Considers Whether to Weigh In on Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement... ComplianceExpert OpinionNews Supreme Court Considers Whether to Weigh In on Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement and Constitutionality of the FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions May 7, 2019 24 Share FacebookLinkedinTwitter You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Compliance New Administrative False Claims Act Gives Federal Agencies More Power to Pursue and Settle Fraud Claims in 2025 Development Special Alert – Chemonics to pay $3.1 Million to Resolve Allegations of Fraudulent Billing under Supply Chain Contract Compliance The False Claims Act How a Recent Decision Rejecting Qui Tam Lawsuits May Affect Enforcement
