Home Compliance Supreme Court Considers Whether to Weigh In on Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement... ComplianceExpert OpinionNews Supreme Court Considers Whether to Weigh In on Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement and Constitutionality of the FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions May 7, 2019 19 Share FacebookLinkedinTwitter You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Compliance Healthcare Fraud: A World Beyond the Anti-Kickback Statute Compliance Software as a Service Designed to Do Defendant’s Illegal Service? Compliance Government Still Has Good Cause to Extend Its Deadline After a Decade and 15 Extensions