Government contractors should take note of a March 4, 2020, ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that lowers the jurisdictional threshold for establishing a claim under the False Claims Act. The 3rd Circuit’s decision in Druding v. Care Alternatives revived an FCA claim that the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey rejected through a grant of summary judgment. At the lower court, experts retained by the plaintiff and defendant disagreed about the factual basis of the alleged false claim. Confronted by this disagreement, the District Court ruled that “a mere difference of opinion between experts regarding the accuracy” of the claim at issue was “insufficient to create a triable dispute of fact as to the element of falsity.” The District Court opined that to meet the jurisdictional threshold, a plaintiff under the FCA must provide “evidence of an objective falsehood.”
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
New Bill Would Tighten Fraud Screening Across Federal Awards • US Department of Labor Announces 2026 Virtual Seminars for Current, Prospective Federal Contractors on Prevailing Wage Requirements • Grants Compliance 101: Your Grant Project Is Moving Forward. Now What? • FTC Signals Renewed “Made in USA” Enforcement Focus Following Trump Executive Order • The New DEI Crackdown: What Federal Contractors Must Do Now
3rd Circuit Case of First Impression Clarifies Lower Threshold for FCA Actions
ADV images | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.