On June 22, the Supreme Court weighed in on a question it explicitly left open in Kokesh v. SEC – whether, and to what extent, the Securities and Exchange Commission in a civil enforcement action may seek “disgorgement” as “equitable relief that may be appropriate or necessary for the benefit of investors”. In an 8-1 decision, the Court in Liu v. SEC concluded that a disgorgement order can indeed qualify as “equitable relief,” subject to certain limitations. The case has important implications for how the SEC may seek disgorgement remedies in the future under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and in other securities-related actions.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
FAR 52.222-90 Explained: New Clause May Result in 6,825 Audits Per Year • DOJ Stands Up a New Fraud-Fighting Division: What Government Contractors Need to Know About the National Fraud Enforcement Division • FAR Updates Trade Agreement Act Thresholds • GE’s $36 Million ITAR Penalty — A Wake-Up Call for Export Control Compliance • Treasury Canceled Booz Contracts Over Vetting of IRS Leaker, Bessent Says
Kokesh’s Open Question Resolved: SCOTUS Upholds but Limits Equitable Disgorgement in SEC Civil Actions
Steven Frame | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.