Last month, the Supreme Court’s decision in Liu v. SEC put to rest any concerns about the SEC’s general authority to seek disgorgement as an equitable remedy. One of the SEC’s main enforcement weapons, disgorgement requires wrongdoers to give up profits earned from illegal activity. The SEC routinely seeks disgorgement to prevent unjust enrichment and to deter future violations. In Liu, the Court held that the SEC can continue to seek disgorgement as proper equitable relief—so long as the amount disgorged does not exceed the wrongdoer’s net profits and the disgorged funds are generally transferred to victims.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
FAR 52.222-90 Explained: New Clause May Result in 6,825 Audits Per Year • DOJ Stands Up a New Fraud-Fighting Division: What Government Contractors Need to Know About the National Fraud Enforcement Division • FAR Updates Trade Agreement Act Thresholds • GE’s $36 Million ITAR Penalty — A Wake-Up Call for Export Control Compliance • Treasury Canceled Booz Contracts Over Vetting of IRS Leaker, Bessent Says
SCOTUS OKs SEC Disgorgement—But Imposes New Limitations
Erik Cox Photography | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.