Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now

GAO Says Agency Can Establish a Competitive Range of One Vendor • Death by CPARS: Too Many Marginal Ratings Tank Protester’s Proposal • Top 10 Killer Construction Contract Clauses, Part 5: Liquidated Damages Provisions • Federal Ccontracts at the Supreme Court: Three Recent Opinions Reshape Expectations Around Third-Party Claims Against Contractors • Proposed Rule Would Turn 8(a) Program on its Head

Published on March 24, 2025 • Law

OHA Says Agency Email Was Not a Final Appealable Decision

one photo | Shutterstock

The contractor received an email from GSA stating the company was ineligible for reinstatement on the contract due to its size. The contractor appealed this rejection. OHA found the email was not a final decision appealable to OHA.

Size Appeal of MicroTechnologies, LLC, SBA No. SIZ-6341

Appeal - The appellant challenged a notification that its application for recertification was denied. According to the appeal, the appellant submitted a request to GSA seeking to be "reinstated and be able to pursue VETS 2 opportunity GSA responded that according to SBA, applicable regulations do "not allow for [the Appellant] to be reinstated to VETS2 until the next option period."
Decision - The appeal did not reference any formal size determination issued by SBA, nor did the appellant file a request for recertification. Although the email relayed the SBA's opinion that the appellant was not immediately eligible for reinstatement, it was not a final decision. Thus, OHA dismissed the appeal as premature.

-- Case summary by Joshua Lim, Assistant Editor.

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.