Government contractors should take note of the last week’s announced settlement between hospice care provider AseraCare and the Department of Justice (DOJ) of their long-running False Claims Act (FCA) case, U.S. ex rel. Paradies v. AseraCare Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00245 (N.D. Ala.). The settlement agreement involves a single $1M payment and requires no Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA). It stands in stark contrast to the $200M originally sought by DOJ. The settlement also keeps intact key rulings by the Eleventh Circuit in the case, which clarified that a mere difference of reasonable opinions will not constitute falsity under the FCA – clarity, which will continue to support defenses for those in both the health care and government contracts industries.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
Relators Failed to Prove Defendant’s Knowledge in FCA Case • Quantum Computing Is Here — and So Are Compliance Risks for Government Contractors • Facility Security Clearance Basics: A Primer on the Process • Featured Image of FOCI for (Almost) Everyone: DoD Proposed Rule Would Extend FOCI Requirements to Unclassified Contractors and Subcontractors Performing Contracts Exceeding $5M Insights FOCI for (Almost) Everyone: DoD Proposed Rule Would Extend FOCI Requirements to Unclassified Contractors and Subcontractors Performing Contracts Exceeding $5M • HASC Advances Right to Repair Proposal, Industry Pushes Back
AseraCare Resolves Historic False Claims Act Lawsuit, Preserving Key Lack of “Falsity” Defense
grapestock | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.