Last week, a New York district judge soundly rejected an employer’s attempt to impose a “fraud alert” exception to the FCA whistleblower protection law. The opinion in Malanga v. New York University, No. 14cv9681 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) offers compelling reasons to abandon this doctrine.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
One Part Legal, One Part Behavioral: A Winning Recipe for a More Thoughtful Compliance Program • DOJ Has Agreed Not to Oppose Entry of Judgment On Three Specific Biden-Era Davis-Bacon Act Rules Involving Materialmen, Truckers, and the Application of the Christian Doctrine. • A Decade Later, Escobar Is Still Shaping FCA Cases • Senate Panel Advances NDAA Measure Restricting Defense Contractor Stock Buybacks • AI Is Taking Background Checks from ‘Months to Hours,’ Clearance Agency Says
Court Rejects “Duty Speech”/“Fraud Alert” Exception to False Claims Act Whistleblower Protection
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.
