Home Compliance Eleventh Circuit Shows the Way in Aseracare Decision: Why Mere Differences of... ComplianceExpert OpinionFCANews Eleventh Circuit Shows the Way in Aseracare Decision: Why Mere Differences of Clinical Opinion Cannot Be Fraud Under the False Claims Act September 19, 2019 17 Share FacebookLinkedinTwitter Khakimullin Aleksandr | Shutterstock You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Compliance When Advocacy Turns Into Obstruction: A Cautionary Tale for Corporate Counsel Handling Gov’t Investigations Compliance March 2024 Developments Under President Biden’s Cybersecurity Executive Order, National Cybersecurity Strategy, and AI Executive Order Compliance Wages War Over: Ohio Court Rules SCA Violations Weren’t FCA Violations