Home Compliance Eleventh Circuit Shows the Way in Aseracare Decision: Why Mere Differences of... ComplianceExpert OpinionFCANews Eleventh Circuit Shows the Way in Aseracare Decision: Why Mere Differences of Clinical Opinion Cannot Be Fraud Under the False Claims Act September 19, 2019 24 Khakimullin Aleksandr | Shutterstock You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Compliance Health Care Marketing: The Seventh Circuit Addresses “Referrals” Under The Anti-Kickback Statute Compliance Seventh Circuit Decision Clarifies Distinction Between Face-to-Face Sales and Advertising Under the Anti-Kickback Statute Compliance Relator Alleged the Government Could Not Intervene Due to Conflict of Interest. Why Did the Court Dismiss the Case?