Before the government decides whether to intervene in a qui tam action, it is obligated by statute to investigate a whistleblower’s allegations. See 31 U.S.C § 3730(a). But, in the course of that investigation, may the government direct the whistleblower to gather evidence by surreptitiously recording conversations with other employees at the defendant company, even though the government knows that the company is represented by counsel? A Minnesota federal court recently answered yes.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
Mandatory Disclosure Rule Best Practices for Government Contractors • SBA Proposes Rollback of Social Disadvantage Presumption in 8(a) Program • New EO on Customs Enforcement Tightens Import Controls, Aims to Reduce Evasion • New Grant Regulations from OMB • The False Alignment Trap in Compliance Transformation
Employers Beware: Federal Court Upholds Aggressive Law Enforcement Tactics When Investigating False Claims Act Allegations
Nick_p1cn1c | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.