The recent False Claims Act case of United States ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM highlights a number of the unique issues involved in qui tam actions, including the shifting significance of government knowledge. While that knowledge alone may not suffice to bar allegations under the public disclosure rule, it may make the allegations immaterial if the government continues to award contract extensions. In this case, the district court dismissed a whistleblower’s suit alleging that AECOM engaged in improper billing and other violations, on the grounds that that the alleged misrepresentations were not material because the government knew of the violations and continued to make payments.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
Judge Approves $57M Tetra Tech Hunters Point Settlement • VETS-4212 Filing Reminder for Federal Contractors: Sept. 30 Deadline Nears • SBA Finalizes Changes to the 8(a) Program’s Social Disadvantage Requirements • DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division Announces Enforcement Priorities • GSA Watchdog Flags FAS Product Data Gaps Affecting Price Systems
Materiality & the Public Disclosure Bar: Fending Off Qui Tam Attacks
Vitalii Vodolazskyi | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.