In a recent decision in HotChalk, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., the Ninth Circuit found that the defendants’ liability insurance coverage was precluded for an FCA suit because the insured’s professional service had a direct relationship to the alleged misconduct. After former employees filed a qui tam suit alleging the firm paid recruiters improper bonuses and commissions, which resulted in false claims in financial aid to the Department of Education, HotChalk tendered the claims to its insurer under its D&O policy. The insurer denied the claim under the policy’s professional services exclusion. HotChalk sued, but the district court and Ninth Circuit both upheld the denial, holding that the professional liability exclusion precluded coverage for any claim arising from the rendering, or failure to render, professional services. Because the services provided by HotChalk directly contributed to the alleged misconduct, the courts held the exclusion applied.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
The Evolving Procurement Fraud Landscape: Emerging Risks for Government Contractors • DCAA Annual Report to Congress – Fiscal Year 2025 • Key Trends in Government Contracts Compliance • China Supply Chain Compliance Is Becoming Whack-a-Mole • DOJ Settlements Highlight Continued Customs and Trade Fraud Vigilance
Professional Services Exclusion Precludes Coverage for False Claims Act Suit
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.