Scripps Research Institute argues that it was only guilty of an “accounting discrepancy,” despite agreeing to pay a $10 million penalty to the Department of Justice to settle a recent FCA case involving federal grants. A former Scripps investigator alleged that the institute required them to “entirely cover the cost of their own salaries and related benefits through federal grants.” They also had to cover “the salary for the research staff through the awarded grants.” Because they usually had multiple grants, other duties such as teaching, and also had to spend time writing and submitting applications, it was “virtually impossible for a faculty member to legitimately charge 100 percent of his or her working hours to awarded grants,” the whistleblower claimed, saying this meant their grant reports were necessarily fraudulent.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
One Part Legal, One Part Behavioral: A Winning Recipe for a More Thoughtful Compliance Program • DOJ Has Agreed Not to Oppose Entry of Judgment On Three Specific Biden-Era Davis-Bacon Act Rules Involving Materialmen, Truckers, and the Application of the Christian Doctrine. • A Decade Later, Escobar Is Still Shaping FCA Cases • Senate Panel Advances NDAA Measure Restricting Defense Contractor Stock Buybacks • AI Is Taking Background Checks from ‘Months to Hours,’ Clearance Agency Says
Scripps Pays $10M for Alleged FCA Violations; Whistleblower Warned of ‘Soft Money Policy’
FOTO SALE | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.