Home Compliance Supreme Court Considers Whether to Weigh In on Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement... ComplianceExpert OpinionNews Supreme Court Considers Whether to Weigh In on Rule 9(b)’s Particularity Requirement and Constitutionality of the FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions May 7, 2019 19 Share FacebookLinkedinTwitter You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Compliance Relator Alleged Violation of Statutes But Didn’t Adequately Plead False Certification Compliance Keeping the Lodestar Local — Mississippi Court Refuses to Apply D.C. Rates for FCA Fee Award Compliance Fraud-on-the-FDA is Not False for the FCA