In a new blog post, Covington & Burling evaluate the likely impact of the government’s increased focus on domestic preference requirements. They cite examples of the White House’s formal policy and action plan for agencies to “scrupulously monitor, enforce, and comply” with so-called “Buy American Laws,” and Congress’s proposed legislation to make certain Buy American requirements more robust. Contractors should not be surprised if there is a corresponding increase in related False Claims Act activity. Notwithstanding that increased scrutiny, based on a review of recent FCA decisions, they have found that courts generally have been skeptical of attempts by relators to allege FCA liability regarding a purported Buy American Act or Trade Agreements Act violation.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
The Most Important Phrase in GSA’s Revised AI Clause Has No Definition • What Does the AI Revolution Mean for Compliance Employees? • FBI Investigating North Korean Remote IT Staffer Working for US Agency • SBA Swiftly Finalizes New Rule on 8(a) Social Disadvantage • NYSBA Issues Ethics Opinion on Lawyer Involvement in Deceptive Investigative Conduct in FCA Cases
Takeaways From Recent FCA Decisions On Buy American Act and Trade Agreements Act Compliance
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.
