Cybersecurity, Privacy, & AI

Trending Now
Pentagon Cyber Official Calls Advanced AI ‘Revolutionary Warfare’ • NIST Aims for Summer Release of AI Cyber Guidelines • President Trump’s Cyber Strategy: Cross-Sector Implications for U.S. and UK Businesses • States Are ‘Laboratories of Democracy’ for Privacy Regulation as Federal Legislation Stalls • Daybreak Is OpenAI’s Answer to the AI Arms Race in Cybersecurity

Implications of Judge Jackson’s Confirmation for Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Litigations Going Forward

White House Photography | Shutterstock

Incoming Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ruled on over 500 cases during her tenure on the bench. Her rulings on privacy rights do not appear to be substantively different from those of Justice Breyer. Many consider Judge Jackson ideologically similar to Justice Breyer, and her experience clerking for him undoubtedly shaped her jurisprudence. Justice Breyer was fairly reliable in upholding digital privacy rights. For example, Justice Breyer sided in favor of digital privacy in Van Buren v. United States, and he penned a partial dissent in Barr v. Association of Political Consultants. Judge Jackson has given no reason to believe she would rule much differently.

Source:

Stay compliant and protected with daily updates on cybersecurity, data privacy, and federal oversight with our Cyber & Privacy newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–SaturdaySubscribe here.