Cybersecurity, Privacy, & AI

Trending Now
Your AI Agent Could Become Your Biggest Insider Threat • The New Cyber Deterrent Isn’t a Weapon. It’s Cyber Recovery. • Commerce OIG Calls for Changes to NIST Vulnerability Database Management • Pentagon Looks to AI, Other Tech to Help Tackle Contested Logistics Challenges • How Defensive Cyber Responds to Hockey-Stick Growth of AI-Driven Threats

Lessons Learned From Eleventh Circuit’s Dismissal of Data Breach Suit Alleging Only Increased Risk of Future Harm for Lack of Article III Standing

MR.Yanukit | Shutterstock

In the context of data breach class action litigation, the question of whether Article III standing can be satisfied is often dispositive of the outcome of an action. However, a deep circuit split currently exists between the federal appellate courts regarding the level of proof required to establish standing in data breach class actions— particularly as it relates to demonstrating a sufficiently “concrete” injury-in-fact and whether allegations of an increased risk of future identity theft are sufficient to satisfy this aspect of the standing test.

Source:

Stay compliant and protected with daily updates on cybersecurity, data privacy, and federal oversight with our Cyber & Privacy newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–SaturdaySubscribe here.