Cybersecurity, Privacy, & AI

Trending Now
Daybreak Is OpenAI’s Answer to the AI Arms Race in Cybersecurity • Cyber Operations Aren’t Slow — Our Thinking Is • ‘No Time to Waste’ in Prepping Governments for AI Cyber Threats, Top Dem Lawmaker Says • ‘Insatiable Appetite’ for AI: Maven Usage Surged for Strikes on Iran, Pentagon AI Chief Says • Navigating Automation, Robotics, AI, and Data in a QMSR-Driven Manufacturing World

Lessons Learned From Eleventh Circuit’s Dismissal of Data Breach Suit Alleging Only Increased Risk of Future Harm for Lack of Article III Standing

MR.Yanukit | Shutterstock

In the context of data breach class action litigation, the question of whether Article III standing can be satisfied is often dispositive of the outcome of an action. However, a deep circuit split currently exists between the federal appellate courts regarding the level of proof required to establish standing in data breach class actions— particularly as it relates to demonstrating a sufficiently “concrete” injury-in-fact and whether allegations of an increased risk of future identity theft are sufficient to satisfy this aspect of the standing test.

Source:

Stay compliant and protected with daily updates on cybersecurity, data privacy, and federal oversight with our Cyber & Privacy newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–SaturdaySubscribe here.