Home Law Claims Contractor Encountered Atypical Site Condition. Why Didn’t It Qualify as a Differing... ClaimsLawResource Library Contractor Encountered Atypical Site Condition. Why Didn’t It Qualify as a Differing Site Condition? July 21, 2023 60 Share FacebookLinkedinTwitter Khrushchev Georgy | Shutterstock You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Claims CBCA Releases Its 2024 Annual Report: Key Insights for Government Contractors Law Groundswell’s Legal Fight for $1B Army ERP Contract Moves to Records Access Law A Subcontractor Alleged It Was a Third-Party Beneficiary of the Prime Contract. The COFC Didn’t Agree.
