Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now
Them’s the Breaks: COFC Applies Late-Is-Late Rule to a Clarification, Negates Award • No Bond, No Work, No Excuses: Contractor’s 181-Day Failure to Secure Required Bonds Justifies Default Termination • Handshake Deal? ASBCA Rejects Contractor’s Implied Contract Claim • Let’s Clarify and Discuss: GAO Explains the Difference Between Clarifications and Discussions • AI Is Reading Your Bids. Here’s What You Can Do About It (with David Timm)

Court Finds Contractor’s Claims Really Just an Untimely Appeal of a Default Termination; Bowman Construction Co. v. United States, COFC No. 18-1822C

You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please to view your news subscription(s).

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.