The solicitation required offerors to submit an original government-provided pdf. The protester submitted a completed non-fillable pdf. GAO said the agency rightly rejected the submission. The government-provided form was fillable. The solicitation required submission of the original form, so the protester’s submission should’ve been fillable.
New Generation Solution, LLC, GAO B-421941
- PDF Requirement – The solicitation included a fillable pdf of a government form. The solicitation stated offerors had to complete and submit the original, fillable version of the form. The protester submitted a completed form, but it was a copy, and it was not fillable. The agency excluded the protester from the competition.
- Original, Fillable Form – The protester argued the solicitation did not require the pdf to be submitted in its original, fillable form. GAO rejected the argument. The solicitation expressly stated the form “shall be sbumistted in the “original Government-provided . . . form.” The government-provided form was a fillable form.
- Latent Ambiguity – The protester argued the instructions were ambiguous. The protester contended one could interpret the instructions as simply requiring offerors to complete the fillable form, but it did not require them to submit the fillable form. GAO was not persuaded. Again, the solicitation required offerors to submit the original, government-provided form. The government-provided form was fillable. So, the submission had to still be a fillable pdf.
The protester is represented by W. Brad English, Emily J. Chancey, Jon D. Levin, and Nicholas P. Greer of Maynard Nexsen, PC. The agency is represented by Russell W. Bottom and Daniel C. McIntosh of the Defense Information Systems Agency. GAO attorneys Michale P. Grogan and Evan D. Wesser participated in the decision.
--Case summary by Craig LaChance, Senior Editor