Instructions for Proposal Revisions Did Not Preclude Awardee from Adjusting Labor Rates Downward; ARES Technical Services Corporation, GAO B-415081.5

Protest challenging agency’s evaluation of the awardee’s proposal is denied. The protester contended that the awardee had revised its proposal in a manner that was inconsistent with agency’s instructions following corrective action. But GAO found that this argument was based on a faulty premise, namely, that the instructions precluded offerors from lowering their direct labor […]
Must be a Paid Member or a Free Trial Member to Access Content. Members log in here.