Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now

No Standing, No Service: Why an ICE Air Contractor Couldn’t Challenge a Deportation Support Contract • Whither the Training Materials? Failure to Address Manual Requirement Sinks Proposal for Marine Systems Contract • Federal Circuit Unwilling to Countenance Protest Filed Two Years Late • House Committee to Consider Legislation Codifying the Rule of Two for Small Business Set-Asides • US Navy FY 2027 Budget Request – Key Trends, Risks, and Implications

Published on March 31, 2025 • Law

OHA Confirms It Lacks Jurisdiction Over 8(a) Eligibility Protests

ibreakstock | Shutterstock

Although the appellant alleged it brought a size appeal before OHA, it labeled the its protest as an "8(a) Eligibility Protest." Consequently, OHA dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Size Appeal of Fiber Business Solutions Group, Inc. d/b/a GForce, SBA No. SIZ-6345

Appeal - The appellant claimed the awardee was ineligible for award because the awardee was not "admitted" into the 8(a) program until after it had submitted its offer. SBA dismissed for lack of standing. It explained the eligibility of a participant for a sole source or competitive 8(a) requirement may not be challenged by another party as part of a bid or other contract protest.
Decision - Although the appellant alleged it brought a "size protest," it labeled the protest an "8(a) Eligibility Protest." As such, OHA recognized such disputes were not under its jurisdiction. Thus it dismissed the appeal.

-- Case summary by Joshua Lim, Assistant Editor.

SIZE Appeal of- Fiber Business Solutions Group, Inc. d:b:a GForce,

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.