Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now

Who Needs Privity? Subcontractor Survives Jurisdictional Challenge Through Prime Sponsorship of Its Claim • GAO Reaffirms that Proposals Without a Realistic Chance of Award Do Not Belong in the Competitive Range • Protests are Starting to Test the Limits of Procurement Speed • A Judge Ruled that SBA Mishandled the ATI Case. But the Company Remains Suspended. • Anthropic and Iran – the Government Contracting State of Play

Published on March 31, 2025 • Law

OHA Confirms It Lacks Jurisdiction Over 8(a) Eligibility Protests

ibreakstock | Shutterstock

Although the appellant alleged it brought a size appeal before OHA, it labeled the its protest as an "8(a) Eligibility Protest." Consequently, OHA dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Size Appeal of Fiber Business Solutions Group, Inc. d/b/a GForce, SBA No. SIZ-6345

Appeal - The appellant claimed the awardee was ineligible for award because the awardee was not "admitted" into the 8(a) program until after it had submitted its offer. SBA dismissed for lack of standing. It explained the eligibility of a participant for a sole source or competitive 8(a) requirement may not be challenged by another party as part of a bid or other contract protest.
Decision - Although the appellant alleged it brought a "size protest," it labeled the protest an "8(a) Eligibility Protest." As such, OHA recognized such disputes were not under its jurisdiction. Thus it dismissed the appeal.

-- Case summary by Joshua Lim, Assistant Editor.

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.