Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now

Lost in Cyberspace: Late-Is-Late Rule Precudes Consideration of Protester’s Quarantined Proposal • Raytheon Loses Remand Fight Over Level 1 Cost Penalties, But Government Waived Right to CAS Penalties • Why Not Bidding—and Not Protesting Early—Doomed This Challenge to an Award • “I Could Have Competed” Won’t Cut It: COFC Requires Showing Contractor Could Perform Work if it Wants to Protest Solicitation Terms • Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Update: Rulemaking Phase Begins with the Issuance of Four Proposed Rules

Published on March 31, 2025 • Law

OHA Confirms It Lacks Jurisdiction Over 8(a) Eligibility Protests

ibreakstock | Shutterstock

Although the appellant alleged it brought a size appeal before OHA, it labeled the its protest as an "8(a) Eligibility Protest." Consequently, OHA dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Size Appeal of Fiber Business Solutions Group, Inc. d/b/a GForce, SBA No. SIZ-6345

Appeal - The appellant claimed the awardee was ineligible for award because the awardee was not "admitted" into the 8(a) program until after it had submitted its offer. SBA dismissed for lack of standing. It explained the eligibility of a participant for a sole source or competitive 8(a) requirement may not be challenged by another party as part of a bid or other contract protest.
Decision - Although the appellant alleged it brought a "size protest," it labeled the protest an "8(a) Eligibility Protest." As such, OHA recognized such disputes were not under its jurisdiction. Thus it dismissed the appeal.

-- Case summary by Joshua Lim, Assistant Editor.

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.