Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now
Who Needs Privity? Subcontractor Survives Jurisdictional Challenge Through Prime Sponsorship of Its Claim • GAO Reaffirms that Proposals Without a Realistic Chance of Award Do Not Belong in the Competitive Range • Protests are Starting to Test the Limits of Procurement Speed • A Judge Ruled that SBA Mishandled the ATI Case. But the Company Remains Suspended. • Anthropic and Iran – the Government Contracting State of Play

Try Again: OHA Tells SBA to Reanalyze Small Business’s Affiliates

Jack_the_sparow | Shutterstock

An unsuccessful offeror challenged the size of a putative small business. The SBA Area Office denied the protest. The protester appealed. OHA reversed. The Area Office had not analyzed affiliation under the SBA's multiple-minority shareholder rule.

Size Appeal of S3-RQ JV, SBA No. SIZ-6297
  • Size Protest - The protester argued the awardee was not small due to affiliations with other businesses. The awardee acknowledged eight affiliates but denied three. The SBA Area Office sided with the awardee. The protester appealed.
  • OHA Reverses - OHA found the Area Office had not fully explored the awardee's affiliations under SBA's multiple-minority shareholder rule. To wit: when two or more shareholders hold approximately equal minority interests that combined would be larger than any other stock holding, each minority owner is presumed to control the concern based on their minority interest. The SBA Area Office had to determine whether some of the awardee's minority shareholders controlled the awardee. OHA also determined the Area Office erred when it improperly merged two separate affiliates in its analysis.

-- Case summary by Joshua Lim, Assistant Editor

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.