Parties Submitted Too Much Conflicting Evidence for CBCA to Enter Summary Judgment; NTT Data Services Federal Government, LLC v. Department of Education, CBCA 6887

Phovoir | Shutterstock
Parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are denied. While the parties agreed the issue in the appeal was a matter of contract interpretation, they had submitted voluminous evidence—depositions, emails, reports—outside the contract itself. The amount of evidence indicated considerable dispute as to material facts, which precluded summary judgment.  Background NTT Data Services Federal Government, LLC had […]
Must be a Paid Member or a Free Trial Member to Access Content. Members log in here.