Vernon Edwards’s new piece in The Nash & Cibinic Report examines whether the recent spate of government contracting reforms will improve anything or create more chaos. He notes that the recent executive order consolidating the procurement of common goods with GSA is a throwback to the 1940s notion of centralized procurement embodied by the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949. He is also skeptical about OMB’s rumored rewrite of the FAR, wondering whether a FAR 2.0 will result in a more efficient acquisitions process. An addendum to the article from Ralph Nash himself is more blunt. Nash says these two policies—consolidated procurement, FAR 2.0—”are bad policies that will seriously damage the procurement system.”
Reforming the Federal Contracts and Grants System
Trending Now
DoD Memo – Noncompetitive (Sole Source) Peer Review Process for Contractor Facilitization Costs • Presidential Memo – Rebuilding the United States Navy and America’s Shipbuilding Industrial Base • Market Research Isn’t About Checking a Box (Weathering the RFO – Part 4) • Federal Procurement Consolidation: What Contractors Need to Know in 2026 • Behind the Numbers: The Role of GSA Schedules and GWACs in Federal Procurement
Out of the Whirlwind: What Is Going To Happen To Acquisition And The Acquisition Workforce?
Dominik Bruhn | Shutterstock
Track federal procurement transformation with daily updates on DOGE, agency reform, and policy changes with our Transforming Procurement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.