PilieroMazza – When faced with the prospect of appealing an adverse decision from a contracting officer, government contractors may wonder whether it’s possible to prioritize costs, performance ratings, and future prospective contracts while engaging in litigation. The Boards of Contract Appeals (BCAs) may serve these purposes, as they aim to provide federal contractors with the opportunity to have their appeal heard before an independent board of administrative judges without the expense, timeline, and formality associated with traditional litigation at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC). In this first blog of a four-part series, PilieroMazza’s GovCon attorneys help federal contractors understand how the BCAs work—and why they might be the right venue for protecting your bottom line.
International Development
Trending Now
𝐕𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐓𝐚𝐥𝐤 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐔𝐒𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐬 • Johns Hopkins’ Center on Global Poverty is hosting an event in DC on May 5: The Future of Foreign Aid. • All Things Protest: Challenging Agency Evaluations of Proposals • GSA Sharpens Focus on Small Business with New Office Designation • The Intersection Between Whistleblowers, Compliance, and the New DOJ Declination Policy
How the Boards of Contract Appeals Work—And Why It Matters for Your Bottom Line, Part 1
Zurainy Zain | Shutterstock
Stay ahead in international development contracting with daily updates on USAID, global procurement, and foreign assistance with our Development newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.