You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s).
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
Department of Homeland Security Contractor Agrees to Pay $3.9M to Resolve Alleged Violations of the False Claims Act • Lessons From Treasury’s Department-Wide Investigation Into Potential Contracting Fraud • Are New Defense Companies Giving Away Sensitive Info Through Marketing? • What You Need to Know About the FASCSA FAR Clause • Judge Rejects FCA Settlement Deal: No Rubber Stamping and Bromides Won’t Do
Defendants Adequately Allege Modified Medical Device Not Identical to FDA-Approved Item, Rendering Claims False; United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division, No. 2:18-cv-01010-LSC, U.S. ex rel. Brooks Wallace, et al. v. Exactech Inc.
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.