Home Compliance Sixth Circuit Interprets 2009 Reverse False Claims Amended Provision: What Does It... ComplianceExpert OpinionNews Sixth Circuit Interprets 2009 Reverse False Claims Amended Provision: What Does It Mean to Knowingly Avoid Paying an Obligation to the United States December 20, 2016 20 You must be a Paid or Free Trial Member to Access this Content. Paid members, please login to view your news subscription(s). RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Compliance Whistleblower Claims Fall Flat Without Employer Knowledge of Fraud Compliance If You’re Going to Assert a Violation of the False Claims Act, You Need to Identify Specific False Claims Compliance Did Duty Evasion Spell FCA Trouble for the Importer? Ninth Circuit Says Yes