In an opinion released early this week, the Seventh Circuit both fortified the U.S. Department of Justice’s position that it has broad authority to proactively dismiss actions brought under the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions and carved a new path for defending such dismissal motions. By reversing a rare district court decision concluding that DOJ failed to provide a sufficient rational basis for dismissal pursuant to 31 U.S.C. section 3730(c)(2)(A), the Seventh Circuit’s decision adds to the overwhelming body of cases siding with DOJ on this issue and increases the degree of difficulty for relators challenging an affirmative dismissal. However, the novel approach on which this decision is based creates a three-way circuit split. That split, combined with recent rumblings from Congress, creates a heightened risk that the rules of the road regarding affirmative qui tam dismissals may soon be in flux.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
FAR Council’s PRA Request for New Contractor Anti-DEI Requirement Raises Speculation About Annual Information Collection • Six Questions Federal Contractors Are Asking About the New DEI Executive Order • ICE Reclassifies Common Form I-9 Errors as Substantive Violations • Tariffs, OFAC and the DOJ (Part 1) • Cutting Contracts Can Promise Quick Savings, the Harder Question Is Where the Cost Actually Lands
The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same: Seventh Circuit Takes New Path in Adding to Jurisprudence Supporting DOJ’s Right to Affirmatively Dismiss Qui Tam Actions
Daniel Jedzura | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.