Share:
Organizations challenging an agency’s termination of a grant or government contract based on an allegedly illegal government policy need to master a two-step dance, according to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision. Under the Court’s highly fractured decision in National Institutes of Health v. American Public Health Association, plaintiffs challenging both the terminations of their individual government grants or contracts and the policy on which the terminations were based must generally file separate suits in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims under the Tucker Act and in federal district court under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
Read the full post at Vinson & Elkins
Share:
