A federal judge in Minnesota held that DOJ was required to articulate the factual basis for its allegation that the defendants’ claims for payment resulted from kickbacks, rejecting the argument that such information was irrelevant based on a legal presumption of causation. The government alleged that defendants Precision Lens and Paul Ehlen provided kickbacks to physicians, including “lavish hunting, fishing and golf trips, private plane flights, frequent-flyer miles and other items of value,” to induce them to use products the defendants supplied. The government further alleged that these kickbacks violated the Anti-Kickback Statute, causing the submission of false claims to the government.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
Proposed DFARS Rule Could Require Disclosures and Mitigation Related to Foreign Ownership, Control, and Influence (FOCI) on Certain Unclassified Contracts • OMB Plans to Make IT Contract Data Collection Public, Per Federal CIO • The DOJ Wants Strong FCA Whistleblower Lawsuits From Data Miners • US Investors Warm to Ukrainian Defense Startups—But Export Laws Slow Cooperation • Virginia Expands Restrictions on Employee Non-Compete Agreements
Court Orders DOJ to Articulate Factual Basis for Allegation that AKS Violations Caused the Submission of False Claims
Eugenia Terekhova | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.