The Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in one of the largest False Claims Act recoveries in recent years, reinstating the majority of a massive $350 million jury verdict. The decision weighs in on a number of key and emerging FCA issues, including materiality under Escobar and relator standing. The decision is beneficial to relators and the government, but the Eleventh Circuit’s reasoning, especially with regard to Escobar, is less than clear and leaves much open to interpretation. It states that the key difference between two claims is whether the purported fraudulent scheme had a direct and “obvious” impact on the government’s payments.
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
AI and ICT Compliance, Rare Earth Supply Chains, Small Business Fraud, Cyber Enforcement • Contractor Settles False Claim Allegations Over Cybersecurity Violations • Amid Rising Interest in Defense, IPOs Are an Increasingly Viable Exit Route for Investors • Just Having a ‘Human in the Loop’ Is Not AI Governance • Space Force Acquisition Nominee Faces Ethics Scrutiny over Defense Industry Ties
How Do You Know When a Term Is Material? It’s “Obvious,” Says the Eleventh Circuit
Stefan Malloch | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.