Last week, the Tenth Circuit, in a detailed analysis of the False Claims Act’s materiality requirement, affirmed the grant of summary judgment to a hospital accused of misreporting patient arrival times and falsely certifying that its employee handbooks discussed the FCA. Putting Escobar to work, the court found no materiality despite evidence that could show the hospital knowingly reported false patient arrival times and signed certifications without basis. Key to the court’s analysis was that the government had investigated relator’s allegations and “has done nothing in response.” United States ex rel. Janssen v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital, No. 19-3011, 2020 WL 594508, at *6 (10th Cir. Feb. 7, 2020).
Regulations, Compliance, & Enforcement
Trending Now
New Suit Seeks to Enjoin EO 14398: Implications for Government Contractors • The GSA AI Clause Clock Is About to Start: What Schedule Holders Must Do Before Refresh 32 Drops • EO 14398 Contract Clauses and Compliance Reporting – Get Ready, It’s Already Here! • Government Contractors Take Note: The $17 Million IBM Settlement Brings a New Era of DEI Enforcement Under the False Claims Act • DOJ Alleges That U.S. Defense Contractor Bribed Kurdish Official In Connection With Jet Fuel Contracts
Wait a Minute—No Escobar Materiality as to Hospital’s Patient Arrival Time Reports and Employee Handbooks
Alexander Supertramp | Shutterstock
Track False Claims Act cases, audit trends, and compliance best practices with our Compliance & Enforcement newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.