Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now
Supreme Court Holds that Federal Law Does Not Preempt State Tort Claims When the Contractor’s Own Negligence Causes Injuries • You Can’t Blame the Government for Weather You Could Have Predicted • COFC Holds that USAID Contractors Properly Pleaded Breach of Contract by Improper Mass Termination in Bad Faith/Abuse of Discretion • Bid Protests in Maine • Army Awards $2.7B Contract for Dark Eagle Hypersonic Weapon

ASBCA Doesn’t Have Jurisdiction Over Late Appeal Even Though It Was Timely Misfiled with the CBCA; Appeal of Kentucky Business Enterprise, ASBCA No. 63023

Appeal of termination for cause is dismissed. The contractor was supposed to appeal to the ASBCA, but it filed a timely appeal with the CBCA. The contractor didn’t file a correct appeal with the ASBCA until the 90-day CDA deadline had passed. The contractor argued the board should apply the “misdirected appeal” doctrine. Under that doctrine, an appeal filed misfiled with the contracting officer may be treated as an appeal to the board. But the board reasoned that while the contractor had emailed a copy of the appeal to the contracting officer, it had also filed a timely appeal with the board. This showed that the contractor knew how to file an appeal at the board. The misdirected appeal doctrine was inapplicable.

Kentucky Business Enterprise (KBE) had a contract with the Army for food services. The Army terminated the contract for cause believing that KBE had indicated an intent not to perform.

Ninety days after the termination, KBE appealed to the CBCA. In addition, KBE sent a notice of the appeal to the contracting office. Realizing that it had appealed to the wrong board, KBE filed an appeal with the ASBCA 91 days after the termination.

Under the Contract Disputes Act, a contracting officer’s final decision is not reviewable on appeal unless the appeal is filed within 90 days of the decision. Even if an appeal is filed 91 days after the decision, the board lacks jurisdiction.

The board may accept jurisdiction over appeals that were misfiled with a different tribunal. KBE argued that the misfiled appeal exception applied because the company had sent notice of its appeal to the contracting officer. 

But the board reasoned that a notice of appeal to the contracting officer must demonstrate an intent to appeal for jurisdiction to attach. The board concluded that the KBE’s email notice to the contracting officer did not express any intent to appeal to the ASBCA. Rather, the email, which was also filed with the CBCA, demonstrated that KBE knew how to file an appeal with a board. Thus, KBE’s appeal was not a misdirected appeal; it was just late.

KBE is represented by Dondra J. Meredith of the Education and Workforce Development Cabinet. The government is represented by Scott N. Flesch and Captain Philip L. Aubart of the Army.

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.