Courts, Boards, & GAO

Trending Now
Lost in Cyberspace: Late-Is-Late Rule Precudes Consideration of Protester’s Quarantined  Proposal • Raytheon Loses Remand Fight Over Level 1 Cost Penalties, But Government Waived Right to CAS Penalties • Why Not Bidding—and Not Protesting Early—Doomed This Challenge to an Award • “I Could Have Competed” Won’t Cut It: COFC Requires Showing Contractor Could Perform Work if it Wants to Protest Solicitation Terms • Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Update: Rulemaking Phase Begins with the Issuance of Four Proposed Rules

Not Every Communication from an Agency Is a Final Decision

The agency sent a letter demanding payment. The contractor appealed. The CBCA dismissed, noting the letter was just a demand letter, not a final decision that could be appealed.

Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 7920
  • Agency Letter – The agency sent a letter to the contractor. The letter requested the contractor reimburse the agency for improper payments. If the contractor didn’t pay, the letter stated the agency would issue a formal demand. The contractor appealed to CBCA 
  • Letter Was Not a Claim – The board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The letter did not state it was a final decision, did not contain a sum certain, or a notice of appeal rights. The letter was the first step in asserting a government claim. But until the government asserted a formal claim, the board could not hear an appeal. 

The contractor is represented by J. Chris Haile and William B. O’Reilly of Crowell & Moring LLP. The agency is represented by Jean M. Athey, Adrienne Zelnick Schwartz, and Laura Reass of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

--Case summary by Craig LaChance, Senior Editor 

Get daily insights on bid protests, CDA claims, and contract litigation that shape the GovCon landscape with our Protests & Claims newsletter, delivering up-to-the-minute intelligence Monday–Saturday — Subscribe here.