Relator’s Relocation Irrelevant When Complaint Has No Evidence Employer Asked Government to Reimburse Costs; United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Aiken Division, No. No. 1:19-cv-00196-JMC, U.S. ex rel. Peter Michael Wanco Jr. v. MOX Services LLC and Orano Federal Services LLC

5
The district court dismissed a qui tam complaint alleging the defendant submitted an improper claim to the government for reimbursement of employee relocation benefits and unlawfully retaliated against the relator for other protected activity. The relator alleged the defendant paid him a generous relocation package as a hiring incentive even though he had no intention […]
Must be a Paid Member or a Free Trial Member to Access Content. Members log in here.